Onaylı Üye
I think ls bgx and others are paid for and will be tested
我觉得ls bgx 还有其他的都是付费的 并且会被检测
我觉得ls bgx 还有其他的都是付费的 并且会被检测
I have never used LS because its price is too expensive. I have used both AE and bgx, and I personally feel that bgx is better than AE. You can choose multiple hero plugin caching options for bgx, and AE is integrated. But in terms of sealing prevention, AE is more outstanding. I haven't used WS yet, it's not easy to evaluate^-^Hello everyone,
As you may know, MemoryHackers has recently launched WS. I created this topic to compare it with other tools on the market, including LS (LegendSense), AE (Advanced Engine), and BGX. Those who have experience, please share your opinions. Thank you very much.
Isn't there an L # hero plugin in bgx?不管是bgx bot ws,我觉得都比不上L#
bgx里面就有L#I have never used LS because its price is too expensive. I have used both AE and bgx, and I personally feel that bgx is better than AE. You can choose multiple hero plugin caching options for bgx, and AE is integrated. But in terms of sealing prevention, AE is more outstanding. I haven't used WS yet, it's not easy to evaluate^-^
Post automatically merged:
Isn't there an L # hero plugin in bgx?