Eski bir web tarayıcısı kullanıyorsunuz. Bu veya diğer siteleri görüntülemekte sorunlar yaşayabilirsiniz.. Tarayıcınızı güncellemeli veya alternatif bir tarayıcı kullanmalısınız.
AI can increase productivity and efficiency in various industries, such as healthcare, finance, and transportation.AI can automate repetitive and mundane tasks, freeing up human resources to focus on more creative and strategic work.
As someone who’s spent his career in the IT “middle class,” i.e., business analysis and technical support, I have mixed feelings about it.
I think it’s great for automating existing processes with clear requirements, which is basically what we’re doing now.
Where I have my biggest reservations is with the sexy version of AI, the utopia that some are positing as the next leap forward in human evolution. I have big concerns about software systems that become so complex that no human or group of humans can troubleshoot and fix. This concern goes way, way up if they’re critical systems responsible for human life.
Even if the software developers do their job perfectly, the requirements need to be perfect, too. Using colour as an analogy, ultimately someone somewhere needs to draw the line between what’s “red” and what’s “dark pink.” That’s a judgement call by a human that can affect everything the AI does. I believe some AI is supposed to self-correct, but my question is where that information comes from. The internet, I assume, but we’ve all seen how the internet can have misinformation go viral too. If utopia-AI acts on viral misinformation, what happens then?
Values and priorities can change over time, too. For example, what if we “correctly” (perfect requirements, perfect execution) coded an AI system in the ‘60s? How relevant would the answers be now in the 2020s, especially on behavioral and ethical subjects?
It’s kind of like the autoplay feature in YouTube. If you let that run in the background and come back much later, it’s likely playing nothing you really wanted to see. That’s AI gone in the slightly wrong direction and taking it a long way. Now imagine if that wasn’t just cute animal videos but something that was actually life and death.
The above scenarios are if everyone has good intentions, too. I haven’t even dove into cybersecurity issues where some person or group actively tries to either: take down the system; corrupt the data that the AI is basing its decisions on; or corrupt the decision-making algorithm. The most nefarious scenario I can think of is if the hacker just makes a subtle change instead of taking down the system. No one knows that it’s obviously broken but the AI just keeps making bad decisions.
Ultimately, at least in my lifetime, I think it boils down to accountability. If we reach a point where our lives are dependent on AI and no one can fix it, and no one questions it anymore because it’s the AI and it must be smarter than any human, I feel that’s a very dangerous road
I mean i really thinks that it could be dangerous just think of ai robots that will replace peoples job. So in that sense yes its a bit fair to say that it can be dangerous,
good helped a lot of people with various curiosities, facilitated the life of several people, both with those who work, both as people wanting to enjoy their curiosities
( M.Kemal ATATÜRK ) Ne Mutlu Türküm Diyene
Bize Emanet ettiğin Bu Vatana Türk Gençliği Olarak Sahip Cıkıcaz Paşama Söz Haramilerin Kurduğu Bu Saltanatı 14 Mayısda Yıkacazz